Only lunch dating agency reviews
Personal matchmaking services account for about 0 million of that, according to The Matchmaking Institute in New York City.Personal matchmaking also seems to be recession-proof.If the thought of paying for an online dating service puts you off, Big Think points to a study showing that the time people give to a match depends on how much the dating site costs. See if your city has a young professionals membership to the symphony.Men who paid were willing to commit an average of 49 minutes to the date, while the men who paid nothing for the match were willing to invest only 28 minutes. Or consider online social networking, which is the 21st century way of letting your friends hook you up.It's Just Lunch appeared in this recent post on MSN Money, The Cost of Money Are higher-cost dating websites worth the money?
A 2005 University of Bath study found that 94% of people who used Internet dating sites saw their match again after the first date, and the relationships lasted an average of seven months.
Still, there are many uncertified matchmakers who've successfully paired people.
Brooke Carsner of Intuitive Matchmaking in Portland, OR, encourages potential clients to ask matchmakers "what qualities they bring into matchmaking that benefits them as a matchmaker."2. It's been a few years since Barbara, a 54-year-old from San Diego, engaged the matchmaking service with whom she had a bad experience. Matchmakers with a smaller client base "often work ten times harder than someone managing a bunch of clients," says Clampitt.
If you're short on time, want personalized help or are just looking to try a new way to find a mate, a matchmaker can be a great option.
But even though these professionals insert themselves into the most personal parts of singles' lives, there's no industry regulator outside of general business-rating entities like the Better Business Bureau.